Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 44
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 657-664

Antioxidant and genoprotective effects of osthole against cadmium-induced DNA damage: an in vitro study using comet assay


1 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran., I.R. Iran
2 Department of Pharmacognosy and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran., I.R. Iran

Date of Submission03-Oct-2021
Date of Decision05-Mar-2022
Date of Acceptance14-Jun-2022
Date of Web Publication29-Oct-2022

Correspondence Address:
Mahmoud Etebari
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
I.R. Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.359432

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background and purpose: Osthole, a plant-derived coumarin, has shown numerous pharmacological effects. However, its genoprotective effects against cadmium-induced DNA damage have not been determined yet. Therefore, this project aimed to assess the effectiveness of osthole against genotoxicity caused by cadmium.
Experimental approach: For this purpose, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with various concentrations of osthole (40, 60, 80, and 120 µM) 24 h before cadmium chloride (CdCl2) treatment (40 µM), and then DNA damage was evaluated by comet assay. Furthermore, DPPH and free thiol group assays were applied to evaluate reactive oxygen species scavenger and antioxidant capacities of osthole.
Findings / Results: In the present study, all concentrations of osthole significantly decreased CdCl2-induced DNA damage. Furthermore, the antioxidant properties of the osthole were confirmed by DPPH and free thiol assays.
Conclusion and implications: Overall, the findings of this project revealed that osthole could ameliorate cadmium-induced genotoxicity probably by its antioxidant activity.

Keywords: Cadmium; Comet assay; DNA damage; Genotoxicity, Osthole; Oxidative stress.


How to cite this article:
Vahidifar E, Sajjadi SE, Etebari M. Antioxidant and genoprotective effects of osthole against cadmium-induced DNA damage: an in vitro study using comet assay. Res Pharma Sci 2022;17:657-64

How to cite this URL:
Vahidifar E, Sajjadi SE, Etebari M. Antioxidant and genoprotective effects of osthole against cadmium-induced DNA damage: an in vitro study using comet assay. Res Pharma Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 30];17:657-64. Available from: https://www.rpsjournal.net/text.asp?2022/17/6/657/359432




  Introduction Top


As a heavy metal, cadmium can continuously, be added to the environment because of its abundant industry application [1]. It can quickly enter plants and the food chain due to its high solubility. Food materials and cigarette smoke are some of the primary sources of the mentioned metal. Cadmium's main exposure routes are inhalation, oral, and dermal for animals and humans [2]. The absorption amount of cadmium depends on the exposure way. Three to ten percent of cadmium absorption is related to the oral route, whereas 50% is inhalation. After absorption, cadmium has a rapid and complete distribution to various body organs. The half-life of cadmium in humans is 15-20 years [3]. The amount of cadmium in different tissues is associated with metallothionein (MT) content, which indicated a tremendous binding affinity to cadmium. Despite reduced production and application of cadmium in countries, it is a primary concern for human health due to its high stability and durability in the organism body and milieu [4]. Cadmium is a toxic metal whose toxicity is shown in plants, animals, and humans. Cadmium's toxic effects are induced on human organs, including the liver, kidney, heart, lung, and brain, through various mechanisms such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis [5].

The risk of cancer and mortality has been shown to increase with low cadmium levels. Previous studies have shown that the mechanism of cadmium toxicity is the induction of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [6],[7],[8], and cadmium bound to sulfhydryl groups of proteins causes glutathione depletion, decreasing reactive oxygen species (ROS)-detoxification capacity. ROS accumulation is associated with knocking down cellular molecules such as proteins, lipids, and DNA [9],[10]. Other researchers have confirmed cadmium-induced DNA damage [10]. Cadmium not only has a potent ability to induce genotoxic effects such as sister chromatid exchanges, DNA strand breaks, DNA-protein crosslinks, and chromosomal aberrations but also can suppress the DNA repair process [9]. Cadmium genotoxicity associated with some cancers such as lung, kidney, testes, and prostate has been shown in the literature [3],[11]. Therefore, it is essential to maintain organism cells from cadmium's destructive effects on cellular macromolecules, especially DNA.

Osthole or 7-methoxy-8-(3-methyl-2-butenyl) coumarin has been extracted from medicinal plants, including Cnidium monnieri(L.) Cusson, [12]. Osthole has numerous pharmacological functions such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, antiapoptotic, anti-diabetic, anti-allergic, and anticancer activities [13],[14]. In addition, it is reported that osthole, as a potent antioxidant agent, can scavenge ROS and suppress lipid peroxidation [15]. However, its possible protective effects against cadmium-induced DNA damage have not been evaluated yet.

Single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) or comet assay method as a reliable technique is used to evaluate DNA damage. Simplicity in use, sensitivity, ability to achieve quantitative results, short time, and low costs are advantages of the comet method, which can apply in any eukaryotic cell to determine genotoxicity [16],[17].

According to our surveys, there is no information about the protective effects of osthole against cadmium-induced genotoxicity. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine osthole genoprotective effects against cadmium-induced DNA damage in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).


  Material and methods Top


Chemicals

Cadmium chloride (CdCl2), low-melting-point agarose (LMA), ethidium bromide, Tris-HCL, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Osthole is a gift from Dr. Sajjadi. Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium (DMEM) was achieved by Bioidea company, Iran, and Biosera, France supplied fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomycin. H2O2, NaCl, KH2PO4, and KCL were procured from Merck Company, Germany. All reagents were of analytical grade.

Osthole

Professor Sajjadi donated the crystallized form of the osthole. A plant sample is deposited at the herbarium of the Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Voucher No. 1126).

Cell culture

The Iranian National Center for Genetic and Biologic Resources presented the HUVEC cell line. DMEM medium containing 10% FBS and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin was used for cell culture in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C. First, HUVEC cells (40 × 104) were incubated for 24 h in a 12-well plate. After that, different concentrations of CdCl2 (5, 10, 20, 40 µM) and osthole (40, 60, 80, and 120 µM) were added to cells, and after incubation for 24 h, the comet assay method was carried out to achieve the minimum genotoxic and safe concentrations of CdCl2 and osthole, respectively.

Comet assay

The single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) was performed according to the previous studies [18]. HUVEC cells (40 × 104 cells) were exposed to a selected concentration range of osthole (40, 60, 80, and 120 µM) for 24 h, thereafter the culture medium was changed, and incubation with CdCl2 at 40 µM was continued for a further 24 h. Then, the HUVEC cells were washed with PBS two times and suspended in it (1 mL). After that, cells were dissolved in 1% LMA and spread onto slides preloaded with normal agarose (1.5%). The slides were plunged in cold lysing buffer containing 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 10% DMSO, 1% Triton X-100 (pH 10) for 1 h. Then, samples were maintained in a gel electrophoresis tank full of cold electrophoretic buffer containing 1 mM Na2EDTA and 300 mM NaOH (pH 13) for 20 min, and after that, the samples were electrophoresed at 300 mA and 20 V for 30 min. The slides were neutralized by 1 mL of 0.4 M Tris base (pH 7.5) three times for 5 min each. Fifty μL of ethidium bromide (20 μg/mL) were spread onto the slides. The image of slides was taken at ×400 magnification using fluorescent microscopy. One hundred randomly selected cells of each slide were analyzed by the Comet Score software project (CASP). Three factors, including tail length, percent of DNA in the tail, and tail moment, were evaluated to measure the degree of DNA damage.

Thiol assay

Thiols play a prominent role in maintaining cells from free radical’s damage. In the present study, free thiol groups were evaluated by a commercial kit using the spectrometry method (KTHI96, Kiazist, Iran) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

DPPH assay

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method is used to evaluate the antioxidant activity of natural components. DPPH, as a free radical agent, has been shown hydrogen acceptor ability towards antioxidants. DPPH assay was performed by a method previously explained [19]. In brief, 2 mg of DPPH was dissolved in 50 mL methanol. Different concentrations of osthole (40, 60, 80, and 120 µM) were added to a 96-well plate. Then, 100 µL of DPPH solution was added to the various concentrations of osthole. Plate incubation was performed at ambient temperature and dark conditions for 30 min. After that, the absorbance of samples was measured by an ELISA reader at 517 nm.

Experimental design

In this research, the following steps have been performed: [1] determination of the minimum genotoxic concentration of CdCl2, [2] determination of the safe concentration range of osthole, [3] determination of genoprotective effect of different concentrations of osthole against the minimum genotoxic concentration of cadmium, and [4] investigation of the effect of cadmium and osthole on the amount of thiol and ROS.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism software (9.0.0) was used for analyzing all data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for data analysis. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.


  Results Top


Antioxidant activity of osthole

[Figure 1] indicates the findings obtained by the DPPH radical scavenging activity, which is a method for radical-scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity of osthole increased with its concentration.
Figure 1: Percent of DPPH radical scavenging activity of different concentrations of osthole. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. DPPH, 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.

Click here to view


Thiol assay

As shown in [Figure 2], free thiol groups were decreased in the cadmium group compared to the control. In addition, pretreatment cells with osthole at 100 µM before CdCl2 administration increased free thiol groups in comparison with CdCl2 alone (40 µM).
Figure 2: Osthole (100 µM) and CdCl2 (40 µM) affect free thiol groups. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 indicates significant differences compared to the control group; ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus Cd group. Cd, cadmium.

Click here to view


Genotoxicity of cadmium and safety of osthole

To determine the genotoxic potential of cadmium and the non-genotoxic concentration of the osthole, we used the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Our findings showed no significant changes in the evaluated concentration range of the osthole compared to the control group [Table 1]. However, as shown in [Table 2], cadmium-induced genotoxic effects in HUVEC cells in all used concentrations.
Table 1: Evaluation of the safety of the osthole. All three parameters were not significantly different from the control group. Data express mean ± SEM.

Click here to view
Table 2: Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cadmium. ***P< 0.001 indicates significant differences compared to the negative control group. Data express mean ± SEM.

Click here to view


The effects of osthole on DNA damage of CdCl2

The possible genoprotective effect of osthole has been evaluated by comet assay. The software scoring and percentage of total DNA damage induced by CdCl2 and prevention by osthole were shown in [Figure 3]. A significant increase in DNA damage was observed in the CdCl2 group compared to the control group. We used 40 µM of CdCl2 as optimum genotoxic concentration, and osthole in the pretreatment conditions decreased significantly the level of DNA fragmentation compared to the CdCl2 group.
Figure 3: The genoprotective effect of osthole against CdCl2-induced DNA damage. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. ***P < 0.001 indicates significant differences compared to the control group; and ###P < 0.001 versus Cd group. Cd, cadmium.

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Many of natural compounds such as osthole have been acknowledged worldwide with a rising study on folk medicine. Chinese medicine and its practical components are considered harmless, dependable, and reasonable [14]. The various reported properties of osthole, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects, confirm the long history of its use in traditional Chinese medicine [20]. The present study demonstrates the genoprotective effect of osthole against CdCl2 on HUVEC cells.

Several reports have confirmed the genotoxic potential of cadmium in animals and mammalian cells [21],[22]. The results of the present study revealed that osthole has no genotoxic effects on HUVEC cells, while treatment with CdCl2 for 2 h induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress on HUVEC cells. CdCl2 induced a significant genotoxic effect indicated by an increased rate of comet assay parameters. Many studies have demonstrated similar results. Rozgaj et al. showed that cadmium compounds caused chromosome damage in Chinese hamster cells in an animal experiment [23]. In another study, clastogenicity and cytotoxic effects of cadmium were reported in the rat hemopoietic system [24]. Previous studies showed that cadmium causes cell death and DNA damage in rat bone marrow at long-term treatment [25].

Kasuba's study showed a dose-dependent increase in micronucleus and chromosomal aberrations after exposure to CdCl2 in human lymphocytes [26] and the effect of fetal calf serum on cadmium clastogenicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells investigated by Wang and Lee. In addition, they found that CdCl2 harms genetic material [27]. In the current study, DNA damage was observed in HUVEC cells after treatment with CdCl2 by comet assay, and also, we measured free thiol groups to evaluate the role of oxidative response in the genotoxicity of CdCl2. The finding of this research confirmed a significant decrease in free thiol groups level after treatment with CdCl2.

Cadmium generated free radicals such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and lipid radicals through indirect mechanisms such as glutathione depletion, Kupffer cells, inflammation, and iron involvement in the Fenton reaction. Adaptive mechanisms, including the induction of metallothionein, glutathione, and cellular antioxidants, reduce cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Cadmium carcinogenesis causes DNA damage and changes in DNA methylation status [28]. Other researchers reported preventive effects of chelating agents or antioxidant compounds such as N-acetylcysteine, vitamin E, catalase, and superoxide dismutase against the cytotoxicity of cadmium in cellular and animal models [27]. The intense antioxidative properties are one of the approved mechanisms of action of osthole. Reports have shown that unnecessary and extreme intracellular ROS generation has a crucial role in genotoxicity. ROS causes disturbance in various biological molecules, such as membrane lipids, DNA, and proteins, leading to biological membrane damage.

Furthermore, ROS has a determining role in the apoptotic process [29],[30]. Free radicals can damage DNA. Hydroxyl radicals cause single-stranded or double-stranded breaks and fragmentation of DNA [31]. As a potent antioxidant agent, osthole has been reported to scavenge ROS and inhibit lipid peroxidation.

Transcription of some portions of the glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidant systems and enzymes involved in biotransformation and detoxification of exogenous and endogenous products, NADPH regeneration, and heme metabolism were regulated by Nrf2 [32],[33],[34]. It, therefore, characterizes a vital regulator of the cellular defense mechanisms against xenobiotic and oxidative stress. Remarkably, osthole has an antioxidant effect, and in vivo - in vitro studies have revealed its action in triggering Nrf2 signaling, which protects against ROS-mediated damage [33]. Osthole has a considerable capacity for scavenging free radicals [35]. The potential phenolic hydroxyl group in the osthole’s structure may be related to its antioxidant activity. Yan and colleagues showed that the activities of SOD, GPx, and CAT were enhanced dramatically by osthole in a dose-dependent manner and suppressed the formation of the lipid peroxidation products, MDA, and 4-HNE, in the injured heart tissues. The effects of osthole are related to the decrease and increase in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory cytokines, respectively, and the inhibition of the production of HMGB1 and phosphorylated IκB-α and NF-κB proteins [36]. Liu et al. reported inhibition of cell death, lactate dehydrogenase, and cytochrome c release, overproduction of ROS, morphological changes in nuclei, DNA fragmentation, damage to antioxidant enzymes, Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, and induction of caspase-3 expression in MPP+-treated PC12 cells [37].

Comet assay is a proper method for measuring single- and double-stranded DNA fragments at the cellular level. This method has been widely used in studies on genetic toxicity. Although comet assay has limitations such as not exhibiting DNA-DNA cross-linking and other cellular changes, [38] it is a sensitive test for detecting various types of DNA lesions for cadmium toxicity.


  Conclusion Top


we used osthole to reveal its capability against CdCl2-induced genotoxicity. Our results showed attenuation of the oxidative stress injury and genotoxicity induced by CdCl2 in HUVEC cells by osthole. These effects were confirmed with thiol and DPPH assay. Osthole significantly decreased DNA damage in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other side, the influence of osthole against CdCl2-induced oxidative damage was determined by measuring free thiol groups. However, further studies are necessary to determine the exact genoprotective mechanisms before drawing definite conclusions.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Vice-Chancellery of Research of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran through Grant No. 399028.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared no conflicts of interest in this study.

Authors’ contribution

All authors contributed equally to this work.



 
  References Top

1.
Filipič M, Hei TK. Mutagenicity of cadmium in mammalian cells: implication of oxidative DNA damage. Mutat Res. 2004;546(1-2):81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.11.006.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chomchan R, Siripongvutikorn S, Maliyam P, Saibandith B, Puttarak P. Protective Effect of Selenium-Enriched Ricegrass Juice against Cadmium-Induced Toxicity and DNA Damage in HEK293 Kidney Cells. Foods. 2018;7(6):81-94. DOI: 10.3390/foods7060081.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sahmoun AE, Case LD, Jackson SA, Schwartz GG. Cadmium and prostate cancer: a critical epidemiologic analysis. Cancer Invest. 2005;23(3):256-263. DOI: 10.1081/CNV-200055968.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Joseph P. Mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238(3):272-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.011.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Zhang H, Reynolds M. Cadmium exposure in living organisms: A short review. Sci Total Environ. 2019;678:761-767. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.395.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Dai Z, Cheng J, Bao L, Zhu X, Li H, Chen X, et al. Exposure to waterborne cadmium induce oxidative stress, autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction in the liver of Procypris merus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;204:111051,1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111051.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Đukić-Ćosić D, Baralić K, Javorac D, Djordjevic AB, Bulat Z. An overview of molecular mechanisms in cadmium toxicity. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2020;19:56-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.12.002.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ataei N, Aghaei M, Panjehpour M. The protective role of melatonin in cadmium-induced proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. Res Pharm Sci. 2018;13(2):159-167. DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.223801.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Cheng C-H, Ma H-L, Deng Y-Q, Feng J, Jie Y-K, Guo Z-X. Oxidative stress, cell cycle arrest, DNA damage and apoptosis in the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) induced by cadmium exposure. Chemosphere. 2021;263:128277,1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128277  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Schwerdtle T, Ebert F, Thuy C, Richter C, Mullenders LHF, Hartwig A. Genotoxicity of soluble and particulate cadmium compounds: impact on oxidative DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair. Chem Res Toxicol. 2010;23(2):432-442. DOI: 10.1021/tx900444w.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Waalkes MP. Cadmium carcinogenesis in review. J Inorg Biochem. 2000;79(1-4):241-244. DOI: 10.1016/S0162-0134(00)00009-X.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Che Y, Li J, Li Z, Li J, Wang S, Yan Y, et al. Osthole enhances antitumor activity and irradiation sensitivity of cervical cancer cells by suppressing ATM/NF‑κB signaling. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(2):737-747. DOI: 10.3892/or.2018.6514.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sadraei H, Shokoohinia Y, Sajjadi SE, Ghadirian B. Antispasmodic effect of osthole and Prangos ferulacea extract on rat uterus smooth muscle motility. Res Pharm Sci. 2012;7(3):141-149. PMID: 23181092.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Zafar S, Sarfraz I, Rasul A, Shah MA, Hussain G, Zahoor MK, et al. Osthole: A multifunctional natural compound with potential anticancer, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory Activities. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2021;21(18):2747-2763. DOI: 10.2174/1389557520666200709175948.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ji H-J, Hu J-F, Wang Y-H, Chen X-Y, Zhou R, Chen N-H. Osthole improves chronic cerebral hypoperfusion induced cognitive deficits and neuronal damage in hippocampus. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;636(1-3):96-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.03.038.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mobarakeh K, Etebari M, Zolfaghari B, Jafarian-Dehkordi A. Evaluation of genoprotective effects of hydroalcoholic and polyphenolic extracts of Quince by comet assay. J Rep Pharm Sci. 2015;4(2):155-161.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Nasiri M, Etebari M, Jafarian-Dehkordi A, Moradi S. Lovastatin prevents bleomycin-induced DNA damage to HepG2 cells. Res Pharm Sci. 2016;11(6):470-475. DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.194876.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ghassemi-Barghi N, Varshosaz J, Etebari M, Jafarian Dehkordi A. Role of recombinant human erythropoietin loading chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles in busulfan-induced genotoxicity: analysis of DNA fragmentation via comet assay in cultured HepG2 cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;36:46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.001.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sharifan A, Etebari M, Zolfaghari B, Aliomrani M. Investigating the effects of bark extract and volatile oil of Pinus eldarica against cisplatin-induced genotoxicity on HUVECs cell line. Toxicol Res. 2021;10(2):354-367. DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfab006.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zhang Z-R, Leung WN, Cheung HY, Chan CW. Osthole: a review on its bioactivities, pharmacological properties, and potential as alternative medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:919616,1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2015/919616.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Çatav ŞS, Genç TO, Oktay MK, Küçükakyüz K. Cadmium toxicity in wheat: impacts on element contents, antioxidant enzyme activities, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2020;104(1):71-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-019-02745-4  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Nouairi I, Jalali K, Essid S, Zribi K, Mhadhbi H. Alleviation of cadmium-induced genotoxicity and cytotoxicity by calcium chloride in faba bean (Vicia faba L. var. minor) roots. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019;25(4):921-931. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-019-00681-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Rozgaj R, Kasuba V, Fucic A. Genotoxicity of cadmium chloride in human lymphocytes evaluated by the comet assay and cytogenetic tests. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2002;16(3):187-192. DOI:10.1016/S0946-672X(02)80024-4.DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.12.014.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Badr GM, Elsawy H, Sedky A, Eid R, Ali A, Abdallah BM, et al. Protective effects of quercetin supplementation against short-term toxicity of cadmium-induced hematological impairment, hypothyroidism, and testicular disturbances in albino rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(8):8202-8211. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04276-1.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Aly FM, Kotb AM, Haridy MA, Hammad S. Impacts of fullerene C60 and virgin olive oil on cadmium-induced genotoxicity in rats. Sci Total Environ. 2018;630:750-756. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.205.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kasuba V, Rozgaj R. Micronucleus distribution in human peripheral blood lymphocytes treated in vitro with cadmium chloride in G0 and S phase of the cell cycle. Chemosphere. 2002;49(1):91-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00174-1.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Wang C-C, Yang M-L, Yang C-P, Liang C-H, Lee C-Y, Lin H-W, et al. Cadmium nitrate-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity via caspases in Neuro-2A neurons. Toxin Rev. 2018;37(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1080/15569543.2017.1313276.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Liu J, Qu W, Kadiiska MB. Role of oxidative stress in cadmium toxicity and carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238(3):209-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.029.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Rizwan M, Ali S, Ali B, Adrees M, Arshad M, Hussain A, et al. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere. 2019;214:269-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.120.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Loix C, Huybrechts M, Vangronsveld J, Gielen M, Keunen E, Cuypers A. Reciprocal interactions between cadmium-induced cell wall responses and oxidative stress in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1867-1868. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01867.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cannan WJ, Pederson DS. Mechanisms and consequences of double-strand DNA break formation in chromatin. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25048.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Tao L, Gu X, Xu E, Ren S, Zhang L, Liu W, et al. Osthole protects against Ang II-induced endotheliocyte death by targeting NF-κB pathway and Keap-1/Nrf2 pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(1):142-159. PMID: 30787975.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Su J, Zhang F, Li X, Liu Z. Osthole promotes the suppressive effects of cisplatin on NRF2 expression to prevent drug-resistant cervical cancer progression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;514(2):510-517. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.021.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Mousavi K, Niknahad H, Li H, Jia Z, Manthari RK, Zhao Y, et al. The activation of nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) signaling blunts cholestasis-induced liver and kidney injury. Toxicol Res. 2021;10(4):911-927. DOI: 10.1093/toxres/tfab073.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Chu Q, Zhu Y, Cao T, Zhang Y, Chang Z, Liu Y, et al. Studies on the neuroprotection of osthole on glutamate-induced apoptotic cells and an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model via modulation oxidative stress. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020;190(2):634-644. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-019-03101-2.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Yan Y-h, Li S-h, Li H-y, Lin Y, Yang J-x. Osthole protects bone marrow-derived neural stem cells from oxidative damage through PI3K/Akt-1 pathway. Neurochem Res. 2017;42(2):398-405. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-016-2082-y.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Liu W-B, Zhou J, Qu Y, Li X, Lu C-T, Xie K-L, et al. Neuroprotective effect of osthole on MPP+-induced cytotoxicity in PC12 cells via inhibition of mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production. Neurochem Int. 2010;57(3):206-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.05.011.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Lu Y, Liu Y, Yang C. Evaluating in vitro DNA damage using comet assay. J Vis Exp. 2017;(128):1-6. DOI: 10.3791/56450.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
    Introduction
    Material and methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed368    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]